WELCOME TO THE CONTROVERSY! "This nation cannot be overthrown by battle. It would never allow itself to be. America can only be overthrown by removing its reason for greatness, its exceptionalism and existence as a force for world influence for good and freedom. The driving purpose that led our brothers and sisters to shed their blood for a new country and which drove a people and a President to hold fast to the premise that the nation could not be divided into two in the bloody civil war. Our vision of defeating evil, which gives our men and women in the military valor and a willingness to sacrifice in each of our American centuries, has been freedom. The greatest force for freedom has always been the Constitution of the United States. Now, this government, of the people disregards the people. Now these rights, for the people, seem to have been invalidated by a force that has no constitutional right to do so." - Author Steven Clark Bradley

Click Here To Go To Author Steven Clark Bradley's Amazon Author's Page
Showing posts with label Quality of Life. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Quality of Life. Show all posts

The United States of America - Vassal State of The People's Republic of China


Author Steven Clark Bradley

America now owes over One Trillion Dollars to China. Last week, the head of the Chinese military called for his government to 'punish' the United States for its support of Taiwan by calling on his government to sell off the debt they purchased from us when Obama borrowed away this nation's future for an Economic Stimulus that has only lost over four million jobs. Welcome to China's newest Vassal State.
When I think of Ronald Reagan and his honored greatness, I remember when I sat captivated with hope and morning in America as he gave his first inaugural address. His words stood out in a phrase that powerfully sums up his whole message. He told a nation that had lost its confidence that it was not that government was a part of the problem or the solution to the the problems we face, but that Government was the problem. It is today much more than in Ronald Reagan's day. My, how we have again drifted off the road of political and economic sanity. Nevertheless, he always gave me hope by his words and his faith in someone much larger and much more powerful than he was.






Barack Obama is no less captivating, but he instills fear and worry rather than confidence in our people to trust God enough top care for themselves. This president is about mediocre and absolute subservience and absolute reliance upon the a system of absolute tyrants now conducting the fundamental transformation of the United States of America. .





As I have been told it so perfectly, "Before I refuse to take your questions, I have an opening statement. Ronald Reagan," Sheridan Folger So accurately said!


When I consider the how great a number of challenges this last best hope for mankind is now encumbered with, and how far less safe we all indeed now are, I think Barack Obama. What do you think. Never stop saying so! God Bless America.

Steven Clark Bradley
____________________


The Looming Dangers of American Debt
(http://www.thetrumpet.com/index.php?q=2460.1126.0.0)

June 7, 2006 | From theTrumpet.com
America has become a nation of debtors.
Increasingly, that debt is held by foreign nations
—some of which are enemies.

What does the term serf bring to mind? Poor, indebted, landless, forced labor—perhaps even medieval. Shockingly, serfdom is a reality many Americans may face in the future. Here is why.

The U.S. national debt now stands at more than $8.3 trillion, of which more than $2 trillion is owned by foreigners. Since 2000, the percentage of U.S. public debt owed to foreigners has doubled.

Take China for example. As of March of this year, China held over $321 billion, up from the $60 billion it owned at the end of 2000. Similarly, Japan now owns $640 billion worth of U.S. Treasuries, up from $317.7 billion in December 2000. Lately, however, America has also borrowed heavily from oil exporter nations (as defined by the Department of the Treasury), which include many nations that despise America. Luminaries such as Venezuela, Ecuador, Iran, Libya, Algeria, Indonesia and Iraq, and several other primarily Middle Eastern nations, now own $98 billion worth of U.S. debt. worth of U.S. Treasuries, up from the

According to Brad Setser, director of research at Roubini Global Economics, “The irony is that the three countries in the world adding to reserves the fastest and thus buying the most U.S. debt now are China, Saudi Arabia and Russia, none of them democracies. … We are increasingly counting on a group of creditors who are not our closest friends but have a bigger and bigger stake in America,” he says.

So America’s debt is growing, and a greater amount is in less reliable hands.

This creates two problems.

First, the value of the dollar is increasingly dependent upon foreigners. This makes the U.S. vulnerable to coercion and blackmail.

In commenting on this radical shift in holders of U.S. debt, Frederick Kempe of the Wall Street Journal says, “The more closely economists study that data, the more they worry,” especially over America’s “decrease[d] influence over … the world’s largest market, the $2 trillion in foreign exchange that changes hands daily. The dollar forex market can increasingly be shifted by decisions that foreign governments make about selling dollar assets. What’s also at stake is leverage on matters as diverse as U.S. home mortgage rates and America’s global political clout” (May 9).

For example, remember what happened on June 23, 1997, when former Japanese Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto wondered aloud about what would happen to the U.S. economy if Japan diversified and began to sell some of its, at that time, $300 billion in U.S. Treasury securities (remember Japan now owns more than $640 billion worth). Following Hashimoto’s remarks, the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged by the largest single day amount (at that time) since the Crash of 1987. Aids to Hashimoto were quick to say that the comments were not intended as a threat. Since then, other foreigners have wondered aloud about dumping U.S. debt (Treasuries), also causing ripple effects through global markets (Moscow Times, May 11).

But what if, at some point, our debtors did want to influence American policy? In a potential conflict between China and Taiwan, would China stand idly by, holding $321 billion in U.S. debt, if the United States was to interfere to protect democratic Taiwan? Would Taiwan simply hold its $68.9 billion if China attacked it and America did not come to its aid?

What if China and Taiwan were to peacefully reunite? Together they would control $389.9 billion worth of U.S. debt. Since China also controls Hong Kong, you can add in an additional $46.6 billion worth of U.S. debt, for a grand total of $436.5 billion.

That is a huge chunk of potential economic or political influence. So much influence that if China even “reduces its Treasury purchases, the U.S. would run into difficulties” financing its debts, says the Nikkei Weekly. That same publication says Chinese leaders have boasted that because China is such an important lender to America, “Beijing is holding a dagger to Washington’s throat” (May 1).

The second problem with having foreigners hold so much U.S. debt is the risk that foreigners may choose to stop accumulating it and start spending it. As with any person, the more money you have, the greater the pull to spend. If foreign nations begin to spend their dollars, the increased supply of U.S. greenbacks in circulation would probably drive the value of the dollar down, making American possessions less expensive relative to assets in other currencies. Consequently, American corporations and businesses could increasingly become targets of foreign acquisitions.

There are signs that some of America’s top corporations are already being snapped up.

Last week, American-owned Engelhard Corporation, a strategic manufacturer of catalytic converters and precious metals processing, announced that it would succumb to German-owned basf’s $5.6 billion hostile takeover—the largest-ever hostile takeover of an American company by a German corporation. Engelhard employs approximately 7,000 people worldwide.

In April, France’s telecommunications giant Alcatel sa announced it would acquire American telecom equipment maker Lucent Technologies Inc. for $13.4 billion. Since then, thousands of American workers have been laid off.

In February, Japan’s Toshiba Corp announced that it had purchased Pennsylvania-based Westinghouse Electric, the manufacturer of nuclear reactor technology, for $5.4 billion (Chicago Sun Times, February 7). Westinghouse had previously been purchased by a British-owned company.

That same month, Dubai Ports World, a United Arab Emirates company, announced it was trying to purchase the right to manage six of America’s largest port complexes, including those of New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia, from another British company. That deal later fell through due to national security concerns and congressional resistance.

During 2005, congressional opposition blocked another high-profile foreign takeover when Chinese-owned oil company cnooc proposed to buy out U.S. oil company Unocal for $18.5 billion (Financial Times, London, February 9). Slightly more than a month prior to the attempted Unocal deal, China’s Lenovo Group bought ibm’s personal computer unit for $1.75 billion.

Unfortunately, American companies increasingly look like a smorgasbord ready to be gobbled up.

But what if Congress continues to block foreign acquisitions, as it did with cnooc and Dubai Ports World? Foreign investors might become less willing to lend money to the United States. If foreigners are prevented from spending their American dollars on American acquisitions, they might begin to ask themselves why they are purchasing and holding so many U.S. Treasuries—and decide to dump them. Not good news for an already weak dollar.

America’s indebtedness is endangering the nation. Edwin Truman, who directed the Federal Reserve System’s Division of International Finance for 20 years, is not a doomsayer, but even he is warning America that there is now a 10 to 15 percent probability of a “catastrophic collapse of the financial system.” Never mind about the regular-type collapses: He is warning about a “catastrophic” disaster on the scale of the Great Depression or worse (Wall Street Journal, op. cit.).

Overspending has indebted America to the rest of the world. We owe the world so much that the threat of other nations inducing a U.S. economic disaster by just refusing to lend us more money is now a reality. As such, as America’s indebtedness grows, America is less able to protect strategic industries from foreign takeovers.

Who is a serf? A serf is one whose destiny is owned by others. Someone else owns the land he slaves on. Someone else owns the profits and technology he develops. All the fruits of his labor flow to his owners.

Debt is turning America into a serfdom. •



Want to read a novel that is so real?
You'll understand why we are
living in very strange days?

Ride the storm of Nimrod Rising!

Have you ever felt that the world was guided in ways that are beyond man’s control? The constant changes in the world since the time of Nimrod 4000 years ago until today and all the events that have shaken the world have been to bring the universe back into the hands of the Prince of Darkness, Lucia, a world that he had ruled with his Watchers before it was all ripped from his grasp when man was created. Nimrod Rising paints a diabolical picture of how the Prince of Darkness executes his evil plot to take the world back by force and destroy civilization in the process. From the Great Builder Nimrod in 4000 BC to today, 666 generations later, you can ride the storm of Nimrod Rising and experience the death of a world and the birth pangs of another. You will swear it is really upon us!


Watch Nimrod Rising Video Trailer

Posted by No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Masters of The Culture of Death - Ezekiel Emanuel The Complete Lives Sysytem


Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel’s Complete Lives System



President Obama’s White House Health Care policy adviser Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of Obama’s Chief of Staff and President Obama’s own personal protector in chief, Rahm Emanuel.

Dr. Emanuel has some very frightening and disturbing views about healthcare “reform” and now, his work seeks to change the way we live and how long we live for all Americans. Dr. Emanuel advocates a collectivist system of “merit-based” health care services called The Complete Lives System.

Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD, PhD

Ezekiel J. Emanuel is at the top of the Department of Bioethics at The Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health and a breast oncologist. He is on extended detail as a special adviser for health policy to the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget.

He completed his studies at Amherst College, where he received his M.Sc. from Oxford University in Biochemistry. His M.D. is from Harvard Medical School. He was given his PhD in political philosophy by Harvard University. His final dissertation was granted and he won the Toppan Award for the finest political science dissertation of the year. In 1987-88, he became a fellow in the Program in Ethics and the Professions at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.

After completing his internship and residency in internal medicine at Boston's Beth Israel Hospital and his oncology fellowship at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, he joined the faculty at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Dr. Emanuel was an Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School before joining the National Institutes of Health.

Dr. Emanuel developed The Medical Directive, a comprehensive living will that has been endorsed by Consumer Reports on Health, Harvard Health Letter, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and many other publications. He has published widely on the ethics of clinical research, health care reform, international research ethics, end of life care issues, euthanasia, the ethics of managed care, and the physician-patient relationship in the New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, JAMA, and many other medical journals. His book on medical ethics, The Ends of Human Life, has been widely praised and received honorable mention for the Rosenhaupt Memorial Book Award by the Woodrow Wilson Foundation. He has also published No Margin, No Mission: Health-Care Organizations and the Quest for Ethical Excellence and co-edited Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research: Readings and Commentary. Dr. Emanuel has written extensively for the popular press, with articles and op-eds appearing in The Atlantic, The New Republic, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and many other publications.

One must only read Dr. Emanuel's material for a short time to discover that he is very intelligent and very flawed in the areas as to the sacredness of all life, with priority of all human life. His ideas fit supremely into the current depopulation movement. Dr. Emanuel's views pay no regard to the constitution nor, more importantly, does it give any sacredness to human life making Emanuel's ideas ride on the back of a gray horse, which runs dangerously close to views also held by Nazi Germany. There is a very discernible lack of humanity in his call for very efficient and well-thought-out legal ways to commit legal mass murder. Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel calls his Eugenic-like plan The Complete Lives System.

Dr. Emanuel first published his ideas of merit-based healthcare in the 1996 Hastings Center Report (Volume 26, No. 6) of which you can read a portion right here, in his own words:

“This civic republican or deliberative democratic conception of the good provides both procedural and substantive insights for developing a just allocation of health care resources. Procedurally, it suggests the need for public forums to deliberate about which health services should be considered basic and should be socially guaranteed. Substantively, it suggests services that promote the continuation of the polity – those that ensure healthy future generations, ensure development of practical reasoning skills, and ensure full and active participation by citizens in public deliberations – are to be socially guaranteed as basic.


OBAMA ADVISERS WANT TO RATION CARE

Conversely, services provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens are not basic and should not be guaranteed. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia. A less obvious example is guaranteeing neuropsychological services to ensure children with learning disabilities can read and learn to reason.”




The proposed healthcare bills now in development in both houses of congress will all ultimately put the decisions about your care and your longevity in the hands of presidential appointees, Czars who were never elected nor confirmed. They are deciding what plans will cover, how much independence your doctor can have and what treatments and care senior citizens and the very young deserve. Medicare will eventually become a thing of the past.

At least two of President Obama's top health advisers should never be trusted with that much power. One of them is Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of President Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Dr Emauel has already been appointed to two very important positions: health-policy adviser at the Office of Management and Budget and a member of Federal Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research. Emanuel has already warned the American public that the reductions in care for the very young and elderly will not be free of pain. Read Dr. Emanuel’s words below:


"Vague promises of savings from cutting waste, enhancing prevention and wellness, installing electronic medical records and improving quality are merely 'lipstick' cost control, more for show and public relations than for true change," (Health Affairs Feb. 27, 2008).

He has stated that savings would require that doctors change how they think about their patients: He believes that doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, "as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others" (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008).


Yes, that may be what you want your doctor to do, but Dr. Emanuel wants doctors to look at the bigger picture and not just at the needs of their patients and consider social justice, such as whether the money could be better spent on somebody else. I would imagine that that most doctors are shocked and worried by the belief that a doctor's job is to achieve social justice one patient at a time.

Emanuel, however, believes that "communitarianism" (another word for Socialist) should dictate decisions on who gets care. He insists that medical care should be limited for the non-disabled, not given to those "who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens . . . as he felt similarly about not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia" (Hastings Center Report, Nov.-Dec. '96). That means that care to a grandmother with Alzheimer’s, Parkinson's or to a child with capacity issue like cerebral palsy should be seriously limited at best.


He unambiguously supports, defends, and encourages discrimination against older patients: "Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years" (Lancet, Jan. 31).


Dr. Emanuel has revealed his malicious and dictatorial ideas of his plan over several years and he published it in the January, 2009 issue (Volume 373, Issue 9661) of The Lancet. Here are some excerpts from the article follow:

"Some people wrongly suggest that allocation can be based purely on scientific or clinical facts, often using the term “medical need”. There are no value-free medical criteria for allocation.

~~~

Consideration of the importance of complete lives also supports modifying the youngest-first principle by prioritizing adolescents and young adults over infants. Adolescents have received substantial education and parental care, investments that will be wasted without a complete life. Infants, by contrast, have not yet received these investments. Similarly, adolescence brings with it a developed personality capable of forming and valuing long-term plans whose fulfillment requires a complete life.

~~~



When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most substantial chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated.


~~~
Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years. Treating 65-year-olds differently because of stereotypes or falsehoods would be ageist; treating them differently because they have already had more life-years is not."


~~~

Accepting the complete lives system for health care as a whole would be premature. We must first reduce waste and increase spending.

Dr. Emanuel’s Complete Lives methodology of applying his interpretation of both “allocative” and “distributive” justice to healthcare is put forth in the context of making sure that scarce medical resources are available first to those who remain productive and inclusive in society. That’s an important consideration when reviewing his “Complete Lives” proposal; it is not meant to address the allocation and distribution of readily available and plentiful medical resources, only scarce ones. It is a system divided into two levels of medical care, basic (guaranteed) and discretionary (not guaranteed) medical services. Some citizens (The very young and the elderly) will receive only basic services while others (Those who, in the government’s eyes, have not exhausted their complete lives) will receive both basic and some discretionary health services.


One of President Obama’s most proclaimed goals has always been healthcare “reform” and the reduction of costs and the spending of America’s treasure on healthcare. That certainly implies that money – tax dollars or deficit dollars – will essentially be a medical resource. This could very easily create a manufactured scenario that could produce the kind of scarcity that would


automatically invoke Dr. Emanuel’s bio-ethical philosophies. Dr Emanuel, Special Advisor to the Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget for health policy and would undoubtedly be consulted on forced reductions in spending on healthcare.

It is all terribly frightening and not for the faint of heart. There are just too many ways that Dr. Emanuel’s own personal type of eugenics; this evil form of rationing could be law very soon into the future.

The Complete Lives System In
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel’s Own Words


Because none of the currently used systems satisfy all ethical requirements for just allocation, we propose an alternative:


The complete lives system

This system incorporates five principles (table 2): youngest-first, prognosis, save the most lives, lottery, and instrumental value. As such, it prioritizes younger people who have not yet lived a complete life and will be unlikely to do so without aid. Many thinkers have accepted complete lives as the appropriate focus of distributive justice: “individual human lives, rather than individual experiences, [are] the units over which any distributive principle should operate.”1,75,76 Although there are important differences between these thinkers, they share a core commitment to consider entire lives rather than events or episodes, which is also the defining feature of the complete lives system. Consideration of the importance of complete lives also supports modifying the youngest-first principle by prioritizing adolescents and young adults over infants (figure). Adolescents have received substantial education and parental care, investments that will be wasted without a complete life. Infants, by contrast, have not yet received these investments. Similarly, adolescence brings with it a developed personality capable of forming and valuing long-term plans whose fulfillment requires a complete life.77 As the legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin argues, “It is terrible when an infant dies, but worse, most people think, when a three-year-old child dies and worse still when
an adolescent does”;78 this argument is supported by empirical surveys.41,79 Importantly, the prioritization of adolescents and young adults considers the social and personal investment that people are morally entitled to have received at a particular age, rather than accepting the results of an unjust status quo. Consequently, poor adolescents should be treated the same as wealthy ones, even though they may have received less investment owing to social injustice.

The complete lives system also considers prognosis, since its aim is to achieve complete lives. A young person with a poor prognosis has had few life-years but lacks the potential to live a complete life. Considering prognosis forestalls the concern that disproportionately large amounts of resources will be directed to young people with poor prognoses.42 When the worst-off can benefit only slightly while better-off people could benefit greatly, allocating to the better-off is often justifiable.1,30 Some small benefits, such as a few weeks of life, might also be intrinsically insignificant when compared with large benefits.8


Saving the most lives is also included in this system because enabling more people to live complete lives is better than enabling fewer.8,44 In a public health emergency, instrumental value could also be included to enable more

people to live complete lives. Lotteries could be used when making choices between roughly equal recipients, and also potentially to ensure that no individual—irrespective of age or prognosis—is seen as beyond saving.34,80

Thus, the complete lives system is complete in another way: it incorporates each morally relevant simple principle. When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most substantial chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated (figure).78 It therefore superficially resembles the proposal made by DALY advocates; however, the complete lives system justifies preference to younger people because of priority to the worst-off rather than instrumental value. Additionally, the complete lives system assumes that, although life-years are equally valuable to all, justice requires the fair distribution of them. Conversely, DALY allocation treats life-years given to elderly or disabled people as objectively less valuable.

Finally, the complete lives system is least vulnerable to corruption. Age can be established quickly and accurately from identity documents. Prognosis allocation encourages physicians to improve patients’ health, unlike the perverse incentives to sicken patients or misrepresent health that the sickest-first allocation creates.58,59

Objections

We consider several important objections to the complete lives system.

The complete lives system discriminates against older people.81,82 Age-based allocation is ageism.82 Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age.8,39 Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years.16 Treating 65-year-olds differently because of stereotypes or falsehoods would be ageist; treating them differently because they have already had more life-years is not.

Age, like income, is a “non-medical criterion” inappropriate for allocation of medical resources.14,83 In contrast to income, a complete life is a health outcome. Long-term survival and life expectancy at birth are key health-care outcome variables.84 Delaying the age at onset of a disease is desirable.85,86 The complete lives system is insensitive to international differences in typical lifespan. Although broad consensus
favors adolescents over very young infants, and young adults over the very elderly people, implementation can reasonably differ between, even within, nation-states.87,88 Some people believe that a complete life is a universal limit founded in natural human capacities, which everyone should accept even without scarcity.37 By contrast, the complete lives system requires only that citizens see a complete life, however defined, as an important good, and accept that fairness gives those short of a complete life stronger claims to scarce life-saving resources.

Principles must be ordered lexically: less important principles should come into play only when more important ones are fulfilled.10 Rawls himself agreed that lexical priority was inappropriate when distributing specific resources in society, though appropriate for ordering the principles of basic social justice that shape the distribution of basic rights, opportunities, and income.1 As an alternative, balancing priority to the worst-off against maximizing benefits has won wide support in discussions of allocative local justice.1,8,30 As Amartya Sen argues, justice “does not specify how much more is to be given to the deprived person, but merely that he should receive more”.89

Accepting the complete lives system for health care as a whole would be premature. We must fi rst reduce waste and increase spending.81,90 The complete lives system explicitly rejects waste and corruption, such as multiple listing for transplantation. Although it may be applicable more generally, the complete lives system has been developed to justly allocate persistently scarce life-saving interventions.39,80 Hearts for transplant and influenza vaccines, unlike money, cannot be replaced or diverted to non-health goals; denying a heart to one person makes it available to another. Ultimately, the complete lives system does not create “classes of Untermenschen whose lives and well being are deemed not worth spending money on”,91 but rather empowers us to decide fairly whom to save when genuine scarcity makes saving everyone impossible.

Ultimately, none of the eight simple principles recognize all morally relevant values, and some recognize irrelevant values. QALY and DALY multi-principle systems neglect the importance of fair distribution. UNOS points systems attempt to address distributive justice, but recognize morally irrelevant values and are vulnerable to corruption. By contrast, the complete lives system combines four morally relevant principles: youngest-first, prognosis, lottery, and saving the most lives. In pandemic situations, it also allocates scarce interventions to people instrumental in realizing these four principles. Importantly, it is not an algorithm, but a framework that expresses widely affirmed values: priority to the worst-off , maximizing benefits, and treating people equally. To achieve a just allocation of scarce medical interventions, society must embrace the challenge of implementing a coherent multi-principle framework rather than relying on simple principles or retreating to the status quo.











There may be many in Washington D.C who want to do as they please without having to explain themselves to the American people. Nevertheless, the American people are the ones who must decide what is good for them. The whole goal of Barack Obama and his shadow government is to reduce the population, reduce cost and to accomplish this however the ends justify the means. If this bill passes, there will never be a return to capitalism, to free speech, to self-determination. It is time to stand up. I do agree that the anger is manufactured. It is the Obama Administration which has manufactured this outpouring of worry and emotion, and it is we the people, who are now and who will continue to declare, "Read the bill," "Hear our voice," "Get out of our lives" and "Restore the Constitution." Unless we stand up now and refuse intimidation or forced legislation that will ruin our lives, you will one day weep for the great nation that will be no more.

Steven Clark Bradley















Are You Ready?



Have you ever felt that the world was guided in ways that are beyond man’s control? The constant changes in the world since the time of Nimrod 4000 years ago until today and all the events that have shaken the world have been to bring the universe back into the hands of the Prince of Darkness, Lucia, a world that he had ruled with his Watchers before it was all ripped from his grasp when man was created. Nimrod Rising paints a diabolical picture of how the Prince of Darkness executes his evil plot to take the world back by force and destroy civilization in the process. From the Great Builder Nimrod in 4000 BC to today, 666 generations later, you can ride the storm of Nimrod Rising and experience the death of a world and the birth pangs of another. You will swear it is really upon us!


amazon.com barnesandnoble.com bordersstores.com booksamillion.com powells.com copperfields.com

Watch Nimrod Rising Video Trailer
You can read more of Steven Clark Bradley's work
at any of these blogs listed below:

What If...


Posted by 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Welcome To The Dictocracy - Dear Mr. President...

What is a Dictocracy, you ask? I know I would!

A Dictocracy is the form of a society that feels like it is free but is in reality bound by Leaders who have only power as their motivation; where the wealthy are maligned and the successful prop up

The Second Republic!


Dear Mr. President,

This is written with respect for your office and with deep concern for the direction of the nation. Sir, I ask myself why you, a very powerful and smart President, would wait so long to respond to the courageous fight for freedom of the Iranian People.


Do you not consider it ruthless and undemocratic, President Obama, to rule over us and make us as though you believe we want you to do the things you very well know will destroy us? Your handling of the economy is something right right out of the Communist manifesto and your creation of a shadow government through your ever expanding group of Czars, (which means king in Russian), as I’m sure you know; ten kings; ten rulers who are answerable to no one except except for the One. It is as though you are setting yourself up as a Supreme Leader, sir?


Is it your intention, Mr. President, we know you have the ability, to virtually make yourself all powerful and beyond scrutiny,eventually rending the Congress powerless and ripping the Constitution to shreds? Are you intentionally seeking ways, maneuvers, covert tactics to remove any lasting vestiges of the separation of powers? Is this just the way you want it, sir?



Mr. President, you and your Administration, have proposed the most sweeping and constitutionally most devastating set of new rules the nation will have ever seen. If you actually accomplish your power-shifting illegal goal, you will control General Electric, and by virtue of the fact that NBC is controlled and owned by General Electric, you will control of a large part of the News Media in America, all propped up by the Federal Reserve.


All this seems impossible for you to get all this through Congress. Yet, you have already said you’d achieve this by fiat, if need be, and that means with with one executive order and the stroke of a pen, your signature you will effectively bring an end the nation that took all the people’s votes to commence. If you enact this unconstitutional executive order, you will destroy the News Media in America, Freedom of Speech will become a mere euphemism and the Constitution shall be rendered null, forever.


So, though President Obama, your words were measured and yet decisive concerning Iran, and I was pleased by what you said, perhaps the greatest reason you did not respond quickly to condemn the Iranian Regime was because, you are a socialist, you plan to be dictatorial and you are rewriting the nation to replace the former one, which you have intentionally killed. Perhaps you are, in end, no different than the ones who kill their own in Tehran. Thank you Mr. President for letting me speak my mind. I hope you prove me wrong.


Reading Between The Lines,

Author Steven Clark Bradley



Below is a letter to you, Mr. President

from Iranians who desperately seek freedom


This letter was written by Iranians who desperately want you to speak out for them. Is this not what we have hoped and prayed for, since their revolution in 1979? I have no criticisms of anything you have said the Iranian uprising except that it has not been enough. You have spoken out twice and I give you a hearty approval of your words both times.


From: Meganima.blogspot.com Monday, June 15, 2009


A letter to President Obama from Iranians


Category: Government

Region: Iran

Target: Mr Barack Obama

Background (Preamble):

There are new approaches between Iran and USA after 30 years. Iranian government in the latest presidency election rigged the votes and Mr. Ahmadinejad came out with fiction percentage of 62.

We all ask Mr Obama not to recognize Mr. Ahmadinejad as Iranian president as it seems he got elected like a coup.

US supported Iranian regime in 50s to turn down by a coup. We strongly ask United States not to recognize Mr. Ahmadinejad as Iranian President. That would mean that US supported another coup against the democracy in Iran.


Petition:

Dear Mr. President Obama,

Your election by American people was not only hope for Americans but also for many people in the world who wanted change in their own societies.

Mr. President, Iranian first approach to democracy got down by the coup which your country heavily supported against elected Prime Minister Dr Mohammad Mosadegh in 50s. That caused a loop back for the country for about 30 years. Since that time, Americans in most Iranians’ eyes were not those people we had thought of. We consider them as people who just see their own benefits and do not care about anything else.

On June 12th 2009, Iranians overwhelming voted for change as Americans did on November 4th 2008.
But in an unacceptable and unrespectable event, Mr Ahmadinejad came out with 62% as president. We all know and believe that they have rigged the election and as Mr also Mr Mousavi and Mr. Karoubi our reformist candidates referred to it as a huge Fraud. So the event which was supposed to burst the country in happiness, it turned out to a national funeral.

We, Iranian people are aware about your new policy about Iran as you have invited Iranian diplomats in all American embassies and foreign offices around the world for 4th of July. The policy that some refer to it as the hot Dog policy. We all embrace your new policy and we all see it as new window for both countries after three decades.

Mr. President, we strongly and kindly ask you not to recognize Mr Ahmadinejad as Iranian president and please withdraw your invitation for Iranian diplomats. We all look for a new window; you were hope for all of us so please do not let another American support to another anti-democracy movement in Iran.

Our Kindest regards,

Iranians




Want to get Steven Clark Bradley's Novels Now?

You Can Get All Steven Clark Bradley's Books, Nimrod Rising, StillBorn! & Probable Cause and Patriot Acts Now!

If you'd like to buy one of Steven's novels, just click one of the links and enjoy reading a book that might even explore you! Thanks again!

All of Steven Clark Bradley's novels are widely available all over the net. Here are a few links to help you read these exciting stories now.



Steven's books are about issues that will make you think and reevaluate the things you've never questioned before. Steven's three novels are listed here and there are excepts from each of his novels. You will also find articles he has written as an expert status writer for ezine.com. Take a look, move around and explore, leave a comment!

bookfinder4u.com

Today, America faces enemies that make the world of the Cold War seem like much brighter times. Islamic forces have declared Jihad on America causing the greatest threat to the life of the United States since World War II. In Patriot Acts, America finds itself under covert nuclear attack from the Islamic Republic of Iran which has linked up with radical American Militia groups. They have set aside their political and religious differences to carry out the widest attack to America in the nation 's history. Colonel Fisher Harrison, the best trained Special Ops killer the military has, is the only one person who can effectively retaliate against their aggression. The only problem is that Colonel Fisher is in a federal prison, framed for a murder he did not commit by his former boss who is now the President of the United States of America. Take an amazing journey from Alaska to the Midwest and to the center of the Islamic Republic of Iran as two enemies unite to save the nation from two adversaries in league to bring the country to its knees. You will be amazed how close to home and to reality Patriot Acts could be!

Watch Patriot Acts Video Trailer


Have you ever felt that the world was guided in ways that are beyond man’s control? The constant changes in the world since the time of Nimrod 4000 years ago until today and all the events that have shaken the world have been to bring the universe back into the hands of the Prince of Darkness, Lucia, a world that he had ruled with his Watchers before it was all ripped from his grasp when man was created. Nimrod Rising paints a diabolical picture of how the Prince of Darkness executes his evil plot to take the world back by force and destroy civilization in the process. From the Great Builder Nimrod in 4000 BC to today, 666 generations later, you can ride the storm of Nimrod Rising and experience the death of a world and the birth pangs of another. You will swear it is really upon us!




Officer Wallace Findings has a past that he does not even know about. During a one-night stand with Susan Chacon, an illegal immigrant and prostitute, Findings falls prey to a crime, an evil plot to conceive a child that Susan will give up for adoption, along with the myth of a financial reward. The only problem is that instead of producing one monetary child, twins are born. One child is rejected and left an orphan, in a world without identity or care, facing brutal treatment and harsh physical and sexual abuse. His twin brother, Jeffery Phaire is welcomed into a wonderful life of plenty and privilege. Stillborn is a thriller that reveals how a life of bitterness and child abuse can result in revenge, deadly repercussions and vengeful actions. Stillborn is full of suspense and action and intrigue and murder. You will learn what a life of pain, suffering and child abuse can cause, when a child is denied an existence, and when vengeance becomes a driving motivation.



Watch StillBorn Video Trailer



Find a common, good man; even a Pastor, a man known more for his good deeds than for any mischief. Take away everything from him. Take away his life, his history his future, his faith, his wife and you’ve created a monster, a desperate man who wants payback from those who destroyed his life. Greg Bradford is a victim of infidelity, man who wants revenge, a man prepared to do anything to get his life back. Imagine, you’re a well-known Police officer, in a state-wide position, and you have to investigate a murder at a State Mental Facility in Logansport, Indiana, a vindictive crime that Chief Inspector Corbett (Core) Mandeville has swirling around in his past also. Both Core and Greg know why they did what they were both sworn to prevent. Corbett Mandeville is well known in Indiana, having investigated some of the worst murders in his state. Now, an escaped mental patient, who has a vengeful score to settle, is on the loose, and Core has to stop him. This adventure is not like many others, since Corbett Mandeville has a closet full of suspense, of his own. This killer and Mandeville both had similar reasons for stalking their prey, for stepping out and taking justice into their own hands. Get into the mind of the killer and the cop, as both find a connection that makes for a lethal thriller of profound actions of vengeance and justice.









You can read more of Steven Clark Bradley's work at any
of these blogs listed below:
Author Steven Clark Bradley
From The Mind of Steven Clark Bradley
http://www.inspiredauthor.com/v3/blogs/stevenclarkbradley
Steven Clark Bradley - Nikki Leigh Virtual Book Tours
http://romancewriterandreader.ning.com/profile/StevenClarkBradley
http://communati.com/blog/steven-clark-bradley
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Steven-Clark-Bradley
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=583829162&ref=name
http://twitter.com/StevenBradley
http://www.xanga.com/StevenClarkBradley
http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A3SMJINWMCARRY
http://stevenclarkbradley.u.yuku.com/
http://bookmarket.ning.com/profile/StevenClarkBradley
http://publishedauthors.ning.com/profile/StevenClarkBradley
http://morganmandelbooks.ning.com/profile/StevenClarkBradley
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/874304.Steven_Clark_Bradley
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendID=249935683

Posted by No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)